Monday, January 29, 2007

The Summer of the Third (or so) Movie


Working in a Movie Theater part-time, I get to see lots of previews and posters for films that are coming out in the next couple of months. Recently, I started to notice a pattern. I knew that the third Pirates movie was coming out, and there has been a lot of press about the third Spider-Man movie as well. But then I was reminded that the Third Shrek film was coming out, and in the same month no less!

I decided to take a look at imdb.com and see exactly how many Third Movies were coming out this summer. Imagine my shock when I saw that there were a total of SIX of them coming out between May 4 and August 10! When you add in a 4th movie in a series and a 5th movie in a series, as well as some first sequels hitting the screens, it turns out that there are 12 sequels coming out in a 15-week span this summer.

Let's leave aside the whole matter of originality in Hollywood and how there are no new stories to tell. My question is: Who is keeping up with all of these movies? There are a total of 23 movies leading up to the sequels coming out this summer, and I've only seen about half of them! And I'm a moive guy! And at $9 or $10 a pop? Sheesh!

Sure I can claim added responsibilities, direction changes in my life. I can even claim snobbery. But that is about to change. I am going to see all of these movies. I am going to see all the movies leading up to these movies, whether I've seen them before or not. I am going to get caught up on my vapid Hollywood franchises. And I will let you all know what I think. You can go see the movies anyway, if you want. I'm not trying to stop you. But I am going to bite the bullet and be the one who brings you some perspective. You can count on me, I'll be there for you.

And then next summer we can start on the Summer of Sequels 2...

If you want to play along, here are the release dates:

Spider-Man 3 May 4

28 Weeks Later May 11

Shrek the Third May 18

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End May 25

Ocean’s 13 June 8

Hostel: Part II June 8

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer June 15

Evan Almighty June 22

Live Free or Die Hard July 4

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix July 13

The Bourne Ultimatum August 3

Rush Hour 3 August 10

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Rest in Peace, Bill

I considered Bill Sturrup a friend. We didn't live near each other, we didn't talk all the time, but when we did get to talking or see each other again, we always seemed to hit it off. He was my first sort-of-"film"-friend outside of George Eastman House. Bill died on January 15.

I knew Bill as the President of the Toronto Film Society, a membership subscription group that honored classic films, both sound and silent, and created a community within the Toronto area for lovers of film. But I know he was much more than that. He was also the voice of the Hamilton Bulldogs, the AHL hockey team in his hometown. He worked the PA and apparently did a great Bulldog cheer over the speakers. Man, did he love to talk hockey. We related somewhat because the Rochester Americans, another AHL team was in my hometown. We were also able to talk about the Blue Jays, as he knew some about them. But hockey was really his sport.

He was also very active in the CrimeStoppers movement. I know he traveled all over the place with his wife to conventions. He was a crime beat reporter in his younger days and was very important to both crime and reporting in the history of Hamilton. As a matter of fact, the Police Department named a room for Bill in their HQ just the day before he died.

I know that he was a family man. I know that he had cultivated a successful marriage over thirty-some years or more and raised two children with his wife. And my thoughts are with them.

Maybe I'm not the only one. Maybe it seemed like Bill was a friend because he was like that with everyone. As I talk to more people and hear more accounts of his life, it appears he was one of those rare people that was able to like everyone. Never had a harsh word to say, even if one was deserved. But if this was true, then the world will miss Bill all the more.

Your crime-stopping days are over, Bill. There's no crime where you are now. I know you've got a busy schedule, what with films playing round-the-clock and people playing hockey all day, but make sure you take some time to relax. You deserve it.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Say What?

There’s a strange thing that happens to writers. They forget what they write. It’s not like they forget that they wrote a book or a short story. Or the titles of the stories they have roaming the wasteland of submission. But specific turns of phrase or descriptions come out of the blue sometimes (“the blue” being that level just below consciousness that really kicks into gear when you’re on a roll).

I was reading over my work-in-progress, making sure my “voice” was consistent and doing a bit of editing. There were several times where I asked myself, “Did I write that?” That’s a crazy question, as I’m the only one that’s been writing the thing, and it’s not made any more sane by the fact that I’d been talking out loud to myself. There was no recollection of thinking of those groups of words in that way, and it was as if I was re-discovering a lost side of myself. Granted, that side of myself has just as many attributes and flaws as my normal side does, but it was still a cool feeling.

The key now is to harness “the blue” and hone it, make it work for me. Use it on a regular basis and make it an extension of my consciousness. And learn how to end an analogy before it gets too obtuse.

Tuesday, January 9, 2007

Jays of Fame


Today it was announced that Cal Ripken, Jr. and Tony Gwynn would be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in July. With the 3rd and 7th highest percentages ever recorded for an induction ballot, their entrance was pretty much guaranteed. Again, there were worthy candidates left to see if they would ever be considered good enough to attain this immortality. The fact that players like Andre Dawson, Jim Rice, "Goose" Gossage and Bert Blyleven are not considered worthy is beyond my comprehension. It seems to me that, despite getting Gwynn and Ripken right, the Baseball Writers Association of America is a gaggle of grumpy old white men, squeezing whatever power they can out of their assigned "responsibility."
Lost in the hubbub of those that got in and those that got close, was the fact that there were two players eligible that likely would have gone in as Blue Jays: Devon White and Tony Fernandez. Now, while it's neither robbery nor an upset that neither one was elected to the Hall, it is disconcerting that neither one even garnered the 5% necessary to stay on the ballot for next year. (Fernandez got a total of 4 votes on the 545 ballots, White not a single one.) Dave Winfield (big hit in Game 6 of the 1992 Series) and Paul Molitor (MVP of the 1993 Series) have both been inducted in recent years, but neither as a Blue Jay. (And rightly so.) Who, then, from the core of those Championship teams, will represent the Blue Jays in the Hall of Fame? The two most recognizable faces from those teams are Joe Carter (who has already been eliminated) and Roberto Alomar, who had an unfortunate altercation with an umpire that seemed to outrage America. Alomar, probably the most worthy of all Blue Jays, will likely be hurt by what the writers see as Character Flaws. To wit: we don't like him and we won't give him admittance to a place he deserves to go because of it.
The answer, then, is no one. There is no one else on those teams that has the stats to make it into the Hall, and certainly no one else that would be considered a Blue Jay first and foremost. It may be 30 years before we see a Blue Jay elected to the Hall of Fame. After all, we're still trying to elect the best players from the 70s.

Sunday, January 7, 2007

Boys With Toys

We moved into our new house about 6 months ago. It was 8 or 9 months prior to that that I took down the surround sound at the old house and started working three shifts at a second job. This weekend, I finished setting up the surround sound at the new house, connected to the 53" TV that came with the house. Suddenly, not only do I have a little more time to actually enjoy my home theater, but everything is new again. The picture is bigger, the sound is better, there are DVDs that have lain untouched in my collection.

I was literally dancing around in the basement as I tested out the connections on the Bonwit-Teller explosion at the beginning of Die Hard With a Vengeance. My wife said I reminded her of a little kid that just got a new toy.

She couldn't be more right. Sometimes I stand in front of my DVDs trying to decide what to watch. It's a particularly tough choice if it's late at night. What if I get tired and can't finish the movie? It deserves more respect than that. It will completely break the rhythm of the piece if I try to watch it in two parts. It's a sickness, really.

I have another sickness. I love extras. I love them all. I want to watch them all. Just ask my wife, who patiently cross-stitched her way through my systematic evaluation of the Alien Quadrilogy. There are two cuts of each of the four films. Plus commentarys. Plus feature-length documentaries on each one. Plus galleries.

But now I have to watch it again. It's bigger now. The space is cut off from all light sources if I want it to be. It's a true home theater. That means it's a new experience. I'll have to start all over. If you want me, I'll be hanging the black velvet curtains to muffle the noise and light reflections off the side wall. My wife will be in the corner, shaking her head.

Saturday, January 6, 2007

Rumor Has It


My wife asked me the other day if I had any New Year's resolutions. There weren't any I could think of until I was laying in bed that night, thinking about my blog and how I could make it better. Then I realized, the only way to make it better would be to have content in it that people could read on a regular basis, which would require me to add content to it on a regular basis. So, I decided that my New Year's resolution should be to write in my blog every day.

That was four days ago. Nothing. What I've been doing is coming down from a hectic holiday season and relishing my reduced role in the consumer industry. In other words, relaxing. But that's enough of that already. I've got big plans in 2007, and I need to get them started now.

For instance, I want to watch more film this year (and more movies ;) ). I just hope that most of them are better than this one. I'll be catching up a lot on DVDs this year, as I don't get out to the cinema as much as I used to. This one was out in the theaters last year, and I thought I might be interested in sharing it with my wife. Apparently not.

Rumor Has It stars Jennifer Aniston as a woman who discovers that she is the progeny of the real people that the book and the film The Graduate was based on. Shirley MacLaine assumes the Anne Bancroft character and Kevin Costner is the Dustin Hoffman character, both 30 years older now. The problem is that Aniston's character, like many 28-year-olds, does not know who she is. This, stated plainly at the beginning of the film, may account for the film's lack of focus. She wanders around looking for something to give her meaning. It's not her fiancee (Mark Ruffalo), and it's not her family. Her grandmother (MacLaine) only confuses things when she blurts the main secret of the film. Aniston then blindly seeks out the Costner character, thinking that he may hold the secret to her meaningfulness.

This aimlessness inspires a distinct lack of structure, and instead of being taken along for the ride, we instead are living Aniston's joyless life along with her, where she puts herself in stupid situations and makes stupid decisions, throwing life's lessons against the wall to see which one might stick and define her. Since it's quite clear she doesn't know what she's looking for, we as an audience don't catch any of the road signs that this narrative is coming to an end, and instead, we just hope that it ends soon.

Monday, December 25, 2006

L.L. Bartlett Interview


Okay, so I got this out later than I would have liked to today, but it's the holidays and everyone is busy. Even me.

Lorraine Bartlett is a local mystery author with one novel out and several more on the way. She was nice enough to consent to being my first interview on this blog. Pick up her novel MURDER ON THE MIND as soon as you can, if you can find it. All the copies made have been sold from the warehouse. If not, then at least stop by and say Hi to her at the Antique Co-Op on Ridge Road. Here's the interview:

JC: Considering that by the time this is posted, the holiday shopping season will be over and done with, what do you think of my timing for this interview?

LLB: Any time an author can get her/his name out there is cause for celebration.

JC: What got you into writing mysteries after writing romance for so long?

LLB: Actually, I was writing mystery first, but I also belonged to a chapter of Romance Writers of America. We had a bit of a competition going within my local critique group to see who could get published in a confession magazine first. It seems to me I didn’t win that challenge, but I ended up publishing more confession stories than the rest of them. I have never written a romance novel and have no plans to. However, because of my experience with a romance chapter, I’ve learned enough to critique and add a dash of romance to some of my stories.

JC: You are a resident of Rochester, but your book is set primarily in Buffalo, what’s up with that?

LLB: My husband is originally from Buffalo, where I set my first novel, MURDER ON THE MIND. We visit the city a lot because he still has relatives there. Also, I thought Buffalo, being bigger than Rochester, would have more crime. I was wrong.

JC: MURDER ON THE MIND seems to fit several different mystery categories, or none at all. How do you describe it? And do you describe it different ways to different people?

LLB: I think of it as a suspense novel with an “amateur” sleuth. My ex-agent considered it a psychological suspense, and I’ve seen it reviewed as a paranormal thriller. Who knows what it really is!

JC: The main character of your book, Jeff Resnick, discovers that he has some “special abilities” in the wake of a head injury suffered during a mugging. How much research did you do on head injuries, paranormal abilities, and the possible linkage between the two?

I’d been a fan of Barbara Michaels’s paranormal/romantic suspense novels and decided that should I ever decide to write a novel, I’d have a paranormal thread running through it. I did a lot of research into head injuries, but virtually none on psychic phenomena/the paranormal. I didn’t want Jeff to be limited to only certain abilities. If I need him to be clairvoyant--he can be. If I need him to see visions, he can. So far no one has challenged me in either case.

JC: That’s true. You never really do explain Jeff’s abilities. But I assume that he wants an explanation. How does this play into how his character develops?

LLB: Actually, he doesn’t want an explanation. He wants to forget about it. Sadly for him, he can’t. But it leaves things open for his “biographer” (me).

JC: Also, Sophie is a very important character to Jeff, in that she is the one person who has implicit trust in both Jeff and his abilities. Will she be returning in the future?

LLB: Definitely!

JC: I really found the character of Jeff’s half-brother Richard interesting. I read him as being affable and likeable, yet still very restrained. You’ve mentioned that his character came to you first. How did this project develop into Jeff’s project?

LLB: I’d written two short stories and two novellas featuring Richard and Brenda as secondary characters (although at that time they weren’t romantically involved. She always called him “boss,” which irritated him no end). I needed a doctor and a nurse, and Richard just “grew.”

Jeff appeared in one of the novellas with one short scene. I used Jeff as a secondary character in another story when I first had an inkling I wanted to write about them as brothers. I wrote five short stories (which are unlikely to ever be published) where their backstory developed. (They’re not mystery/suspense.)

JC: You’ve also mentioned that you’ve got FOUR Jeff and Richard books finished? Is that right? And if so, when can we see more of them?

LLB: I’ve actually written five complete novels, and have notes on two more. MURDER ON THE MIND is the first (the paperback version is to be published in November 2007). The second book in the series, DEAD IN RED, to be published in early 2008, is the second, but it was actually the fifth book written. My ex-agent didn’t like my second book in the series (because it took Jeff and Richard out of Buffalo) but she loved the third book and thought the brothers needed a buffer between the first and third book. So in early 2006 I wrote DEAD IN RED. I hope the other two books see publication, but nothing is ever a sure thing in publishing.

JC: Any hint as to what DEAD IN RED might hold for us?

LLB: Here’s a blurb: Sometimes it seems like murder and mayhem follow Jeff Resnick, challenging his “sixth sense” to solve crimes. Since the vicious mugging that changed his life, he’s tried to keep his unwanted gift in check. But when a bartender at his favorite watering hole is murdered, visions of a sparkling red woman’s high-heeled shoe and a pair of bloody hands linger in his mind. When Jeff’s older brother, Richard, last helped him with an investigation, it nearly cost him his life. Still, Richard is determined to tag along as Jeff is drawn into the seamy world of foot fetishes and drag queens to find the murderer before another life is taken.

JC: I understand that you are currently under contract to write something other than Jeff and Richard. What can you tell us about that?

LLB: I’m writing a cozy mystery series about a used bookseller in New Hampshire who specializes in mysteries. So far I don’t have a title for the first book, but the protagonist is Tricia Miles and, like the Jeff books feature his brother, this series will feature Tricia’s older sister, Angelica Prescot. I like writing about the tension between siblings. I’ll be writing those books under the name Lorna Barrett.

JC: Sibling rivalry is a pretty universal concept…

LLB: I’ve received the most comments from people who could identify with the conflict between Jeff and Richard.

JC: Are there any other themes that you try to hit on in your writing, or does it come through on its own?

LLB: I tend to add at least one elderly person to every story I write. I think I have a lot more empathy toward them as my own parents have aged. Our culture doesn’t seem to value the elderly or appreciate their contributions. I like to show them as still vibrant people who can make a contribution to society at large.

Other than that, the stories themselves pretty much dictate their own underlying themes.

JC: You’ve already established separate personalities under Lorraine Bartlett and L.L. Bartlett, now there is a third nom de plume emerging. How do you feel about writing under different names, and what are the benefits and drawbacks of doing so?

LLB: My ex-agent advised me to write under the name L.L. Bartlett because, sadly, some men will not buy fiction written by women. I’m using that name primarily for the Jeff Resnick stories. I published a short story on Amazon Shorts (“We’re So Sorry, Uncle Albert”) that I would have preferred to go under my Lorraine Bartlett “brand,” but Amazon insisted it had to go under the L.L. Bartlett name because I don’t have a book with them listed under my own name. One day perhaps.

My web site lists my separate identities (or soon will), so if readers Google any of my names, they’ll be led to my web site.

One benefit of having a pseudonym is that people expect certain kinds of books from an author. Jeff lives in a much darker world than Tricia, as evidenced by the language and level of violence depicted, which is far different in each series. I didn’t want to be pigeonholed into only writing one kind of book. Having more than one name for the different books I write solves the problem.

JC: I admire the structure and pacing in your book. Do you outline or plan out your work?

LLB: Not usually. I’m what they call a “pantster” (someone who writes by the seat of her pants--without the benefit of a synopsis). It’s fun, but often you end up doing a lot of rewriting. This cozy I’m currently working on is being written via a detailed outlined (which my publisher demanded). It is a lot easier to write the book, but I worry that it’ll lack spontaneity. I’ll have to wait and see.

JC: When you’re writing, how do you work? Is it a specific time of day? Do you have a daily goal?

LLB: I like to write in the morning and finish my day’s work by lunchtime. Some days that happens, some days it doesn’t. The holidays really screw up my system, so I’m looking forward to January. Once I finish the first cozy in the series, I have plans to jump right into the second.

JC: You use first-person perspective in MURDER ON THE MIND. Is this how you always write? Do you change it based on the project? Or can you tell us how you came to write first-person?

LLB: My first attempt at MURDER ON THE MIND was in third person. In three years I only wrote sixty pages. One day I decided to try changing all the “he said” to “I said” and in a few days I’d written another twenty pages. This character’s voice was first person. I’ve written two other books in third person and my cozy series with Tricia is also in third person. The characters usually let me know what point of view I should use.

JC: You’ve mentioned Barbara Michaels as someone that you read and liked. Are there other authors that you admire, either for their work or what they do beyond the dust jacket?

LLB: I have tons of favorite authors on my shelves. Right now I’m catching up on all Mary Kay Andrews’s books. But I’ve loved Dick Francis for years (have his new book; it just hasn’t risen to the top of the To Be Read pile yet). I like Jeanne Ray, John Mortimer, Janet Evanovich. I read a lot of Bill Bryson’s stuff (travel and language books). My favorite new author is my friend Sandra Parshall. Her HEAT OF THE MOON is going to be nominated for, if not win prizes in 2007 for best new author of 2006. Her follow-up, DISTURBING THE DEAD, will be published in March 2007. I read an early draft of it and it’s spectacular. I’m also a big fan of local author Charles Benoit and looking forward to his new book, NOBLE LIES.

JC: Do you have any signings or appearances set up at bookstores or conferences where people might meet you and talk to you face-to-face?

LLB: Right now I only have one event lined up in 2007, but that will probably change closer to the date the paperback version of MURDER ON THE MIND comes out. I’ll be at the Wood Library in Canandaigua on Monday, March 19th for their noontime meet the author program.

JC: Thanks for taking the time to let me bug you, Lorraine. Happy Holidays, and good luck on all those irons you have in the fire!